Worksheet generator

1.C — 6KA-0015Reading tables, charts, and graphs

• AI read the vertical scale as going up in ones instead of in twos.
• BI counted the gridlines between the two bar tops instead of reading the values off the scale.
• DI gave Mia's total instead of the difference between Mia and Leo.
• EI added the two amounts together rather than subtracting to find how many more.

2.C — 210KA-0057Clever regrouping (pair to round numbers)

• AI paired the numbers from the outside in but left the 20 out of every pair, so I added only up to 19.
• BI estimated the total as a round number instead of working it out.
• DI used eleven pairs of 20 instead of ten pairs of 21.
• EI multiplied 20 by 21 and forgot that pairing counts every number twice.

3.A — 12KA-0110Bar models for part–whole

• BI split the 48 into three parts instead of the four the bars actually make.
• CI halved the total, as if the two of them had the same number each.
• DI found Bo's share correctly but then gave Ana's number instead.
• EI gave Ana's total, which is three of the four boxes, rather than Bo's one.

4.A — 2 hoursKA-0162Rate, time, distance

• BI used only the slower car's speed and divided 300 by 90 the wrong way round.
• CI averaged the two speeds to 75 km/h and divided 300 by it, which ignores that both cars move at once.
• DI divided 300 by 60, using only the slower car.
• EI halved the distance to 150 and then divided by 150, applying the closing speed twice.

5.C — 16KA-0019Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI found what one child has left and gave that instead of the total for all four.
• BI divided 24 by 4 and then subtracted 2 twice, mixing up per-child steps with total steps.
• DI subtracted 2 pencils once from the whole pack instead of once from each of the four children.
• EI subtracted the 2 before sharing, so only one lot of 2 ever came out of the total.

6.B — 1KA-0089Building and counting with unit cubes

• AI assumed every small cube touches the outside somewhere.
• CI counted the cubes at the centre of each face, which are painted on one side.
• DI counted the corner cubes, which are the most painted rather than the least.
• EI gave the total number of small cubes instead of the unpainted ones.

7.B — 9KA-0150Try small cases first

• AI counted one diagonal from each corner and stopped there.
• CI counted three diagonals from each corner but forgot that each one gets counted from both ends.
• DI counted every line joining two corners, including the six sides.
• EI multiplied six corners by three diagonals each and never halved.

8.A — blackKA-0043Invariants and monovariants

• BI noticed there are more white stones than black ones and guessed the majority colour would survive.
• CI tried a few orders, saw different-looking positions along the way, and assumed the ending must vary too.
• DI did not notice that every move takes two stones out and puts one back, so the count falls by exactly one each time.
• EI assumed the first move settles the outcome instead of looking for a quantity that no move can change.

9.D — 30KA-0047Counting by position (sliding window)

• AI counted only the sixteen smallest squares and stopped there.
• BI counted the small squares and the single big one, and forgot every size in between.
• CI counted the 2 by 2 squares as four rather than nine, splitting the board into blocks.
• EI used 4 by 4 positions for every size instead of shrinking the range as the square grows.

10.B — 7KA-0157The pigeonhole principle

• AI thought that one more than the number of colours must give three of a kind, which only guarantees a PAIR.
• CI got to two of each colour, then added one more for each colour instead of one more in total.
• DI assumed the worst case meant emptying the largest pile of 12 reds first.
• EI answered with the number of socks I want rather than the number I must take to be sure of them.