Worksheet generator

1.C — 30KA-0006Number lines and betweenness

• AI counted the tick marks and gave the position number instead of reading the value on the scale.
• BI worked out that each gap is worth 10 but then counted only as far as the tick before the arrow.
• DI counted the tick marks rather than the gaps between them, so every gap came out one step too small.
• EI counted the gaps from the right-hand end instead of from zero.

2.C — 6KA-0015Reading tables, charts, and graphs

• AI read the vertical scale as going up in ones instead of in twos.
• BI counted the gridlines between the two bar tops instead of reading the values off the scale.
• DI gave Mia's total instead of the difference between Mia and Leo.
• EI added the two amounts together rather than subtracting to find how many more.

3.C — 210KA-0057Clever regrouping (pair to round numbers)

• AI paired the numbers from the outside in but left the 20 out of every pair, so I added only up to 19.
• BI estimated the total as a round number instead of working it out.
• DI used eleven pairs of 20 instead of ten pairs of 21.
• EI multiplied 20 by 21 and forgot that pairing counts every number twice.

4.C — 6KA-0067Tree diagrams

• AI counted the puddings only and forgot that the main course is also a choice.
• BI added the number of mains to the number of puddings instead of multiplying them.
• DI used three puddings as well as three mains, without reading how many puddings there are.
• EI doubled the answer, as if the order of the two courses made a different meal.

5.A — blackKA-0108Repeating cycles and position mod n

• BI got a remainder of 1 but read the last colour of the repeat rather than the first.
• CI thought the pattern had no fixed first tile, even though tile one is given.
• DI assumed a repeating pattern must eventually change.
• EI assumed the pattern runs only for as many tiles as one repeat contains.

6.A — 12KA-0110Bar models for part–whole

• BI split the 48 into three parts instead of the four the bars actually make.
• CI halved the total, as if the two of them had the same number each.
• DI found Bo's share correctly but then gave Ana's number instead.
• EI gave Ana's total, which is three of the four boxes, rather than Bo's one.

7.A — 2 hoursKA-0162Rate, time, distance

• BI used only the slower car's speed and divided 300 by 90 the wrong way round.
• CI averaged the two speeds to 75 km/h and divided 300 by it, which ignores that both cars move at once.
• DI divided 300 by 60, using only the slower car.
• EI halved the distance to 150 and then divided by 150, applying the closing speed twice.

8.B — square 3KA-0005Nets and folding, 2D to 3D

• AI picked the square directly next to the shaded one in the net, but neighbours in the net share an edge on the cube.
• CI counted to the far end of the column, assuming the square furthest away in the net is the one opposite.
• DI picked one of the side flaps because it is not touching the shaded square in the drawing.
• EI picked the other side flap for the same reason, without tracking what happens as the net folds.

9.C — 16KA-0019Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI found what one child has left and gave that instead of the total for all four.
• BI divided 24 by 4 and then subtracted 2 twice, mixing up per-child steps with total steps.
• DI subtracted 2 pencils once from the whole pack instead of once from each of the four children.
• EI subtracted the 2 before sharing, so only one lot of 2 ever came out of the total.

10.D — 9KA-0046Counting by position (sliding window)

• AI cut the board into four separate 2 by 2 blocks instead of sliding the square one step at a time.
• BI counted the three sliding positions along the top and doubled them for two rows.
• CI counted the positions along the top row and down the left column and added them.
• EI counted the sixteen small squares on the board rather than the 2 by 2 squares.

11.C — 12KA-0062Factors, multiples, LCM and GCD by listing

• AI found a number that divides both but not the largest one, stopping at the first that worked.
• BI used the difference between 36 and 24 divided by 2 rather than a common factor.
• DI used a factor of 36 without checking that it also divides 24.
• EI found the least common multiple instead of the greatest common divisor.

12.C — 6KA-0081Views of a solid: top, front, side

• AI used the view from above only, giving one cube per square, and ignored the height the front view demands.
• BI made just one column two cubes tall, forgetting that the front view is two cubes high across its whole width.
• DI added an extra cube that neither view requires.
• EI assumed the solid is a filled 2 by 2 by 2 block, which is the largest that fits rather than the smallest.

13.D — 6KA-0085Line and rotational symmetry

• AI checked only the vertical and horizontal folds and stopped there.
• BI counted the lines through opposite corners and forgot the ones through opposite edges.
• CI assumed a hexagon behaves like a rectangle with a couple of extra folds.
• EI counted each line twice, once from each end.

14.B — 1KA-0089Building and counting with unit cubes

• AI assumed every small cube touches the outside somewhere.
• CI counted the cubes at the centre of each face, which are painted on one side.
• DI counted the corner cubes, which are the most painted rather than the least.
• EI gave the total number of small cubes instead of the unpainted ones.

15.B — 8KA-0100Working backwards

• AI undid the operations in the order they were written instead of in reverse order.
• CI gave the final answer back, assuming the three steps cancelled each other out.
• DI doubled the 11 and subtracted the 6 but forgot the final halving that undoes the doubling.
• EI undid only the halving and stopped there without touching the other two steps.

16.C — 150KA-0117Rate, time, distance

• AI divided 150 by 60 and read the answer as minutes rather than hours.
• BI used 1.5 hours instead of 2.5, dividing 90 by 60 rather than 150.
• DI converted 2.5 hours as two hours and fifty minutes.
• EI multiplied the distance by 60 instead of dividing, then converted.

17.B — 9KA-0150Try small cases first

• AI counted one diagonal from each corner and stopped there.
• CI counted three diagonals from each corner but forgot that each one gets counted from both ends.
• DI counted every line joining two corners, including the six sides.
• EI multiplied six corners by three diagonals each and never halved.

18.A — 48 km/hKA-0174Rate, time, distance

• BI averaged the two speeds, which would only be right if equal TIME were spent at each, not equal distance.
• CI weighted the two speeds by their own values instead of by the time each leg took.
• DI halved the correct answer, dividing by the total distance twice.
• EI added the two speeds together, which gives a number faster than either leg and so cannot be an average of them.

19.B — 1KA-0017Truth-tellers and liars

• AI assumed everyone could be lying at once without checking that Cal's statement would then be true.
• CI found one consistent truth-teller and added another without testing whether both could hold together.
• DI assumed everyone was telling the truth without noticing that Ana's statement then contradicts Bo's.
• EI gave up after one assumption led to a contradiction, instead of trying the other assumption.

20.D — 19KA-0018Complementary counting

• AI counted the codes that avoid 3 entirely and gave that as my answer without subtracting.
• BI counted the codes with a 3 in the first position only and forgot the other two positions.
• CI counted the codes with exactly one 3 and forgot the ones with two or three of them.
• EI counted every possible code and forgot to remove the ones with no 3 at all.

21.A — blackKA-0043Invariants and monovariants

• BI noticed there are more white stones than black ones and guessed the majority colour would survive.
• CI tried a few orders, saw different-looking positions along the way, and assumed the ending must vary too.
• DI did not notice that every move takes two stones out and puts one back, so the count falls by exactly one each time.
• EI assumed the first move settles the outcome instead of looking for a quantity that no move can change.

22.D — 30KA-0047Counting by position (sliding window)

• AI counted only the sixteen smallest squares and stopped there.
• BI counted the small squares and the single big one, and forgot every size in between.
• CI counted the 2 by 2 squares as four rather than nine, splitting the board into blocks.
• EI used 4 by 4 positions for every size instead of shrinking the range as the square grows.

23.A — 12KA-0071Overcount, then correct

• BI divided the 120 arrangements by 6 rather than by the 10 movements that leave a bracelet looking the same.
• CI allowed for turning the bracelet but forgot it can also be flipped over.
• DI halved the 120 for flipping but forgot that turning also gives the same bracelet.
• EI counted every arrangement in a line, as if the bracelet had a fixed first bead.

24.C — 55KA-0078Extremal / worst-case counting

• AI found the smallest possible total of the other nine and gave that instead of what is left.
• BI assumed the biggest number could be at most half the total.
• DI made the other nine numbers all equal to 1, forgetting that they have to be different from each other.
• EI ignored the other nine numbers entirely, as if the biggest could take the whole total.

25.C — No, the last number is always evenKA-0098Invariants and monovariants

• AI found sequences ending in small numbers and assumed 1 was among the reachable ones.
• BI assumed a hard-looking question must have exactly one answer.
• DI found one sequence ending in 0 and assumed every sequence must end there.
• EI thought the order could change the outcome, when the quantity that decides it never changes.

26.D — No, because the two colours cannot balanceKA-0101Coloring arguments

• AI checked that 100 divides by 4 and treated that as proof that a covering exists.
• BI assumed a covering must exist somewhere and that I simply had not found it yet.
• CI gave a reason that is not even true, since 100 really is a multiple of 4.
• EI thought orientation could rescue it, but every turn of a T covers the same mixture of colours.

27.C — 14KA-0139Dice and cube face relationships

• AI subtracted only the top face from 21, forgetting the hidden bottom face as well.
• BI guessed four middling numbers and added them without using the total of all six faces.
• DI subtracted only the bottom face of 4 from the total of 21.
• EI added the four largest numbers on the die rather than the four that are actually at the sides.

28.C — 4KA-0140The multiplication principle

• AI counted the codes that do start with A rather than the ones that do not.
• BI counted the letters available for the first position instead of counting whole codes.
• DI counted every arrangement of the three letters and forgot the restriction.
• EI allowed letters to repeat, which the words each exactly once rule out.

29.B — 7KA-0157The pigeonhole principle

• AI thought that one more than the number of colours must give three of a kind, which only guarantees a PAIR.
• CI got to two of each colour, then added one more for each colour instead of one more in total.
• DI assumed the worst case meant emptying the largest pile of 12 reds first.
• EI answered with the number of socks I want rather than the number I must take to be sure of them.

30.A — 2 hours 24 minutesKA-0159Combined work rates

• BI averaged the two times, but two taps together must be faster than either one alone.
• CI added the two times, which would be right for filling two tanks one after the other.
• DI halved the smaller of the two times, guessing that two taps must simply be twice as fast as one.
• EI found 2 hours 24 minutes correctly and then halved it a second time.