Worksheet generator

1.B — square 3KA-0005Nets and folding, 2D to 3D

• AI picked the square directly next to the shaded one in the net, but neighbours in the net share an edge on the cube.
• CI counted to the far end of the column, assuming the square furthest away in the net is the one opposite.
• DI picked one of the side flaps because it is not touching the shaded square in the drawing.
• EI picked the other side flap for the same reason, without tracking what happens as the net folds.

2.C — 14KA-0009Counting cubes in a stack, including hidden ones

• AI counted only the cubes on the bottom layer and treated the rest as decoration.
• BI counted only the cubes whose faces I could actually see in the drawing.
• DI assumed every layer was a full 3 by 3 square and multiplied 9 by 2 for two layers.
• EI assumed the stack was a solid 3 by 3 by 3 block because it sits in a corner.

3.B — 2KA-0011Divisibility rules: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10

• AI added the known digits to get 13 and then checked whether the missing digit itself was a multiple of 3.
• CI chose 3 because the question mentioned dividing by 3, without testing the digit sum at all.
• DI tested the last two digits, which is the rule for 4, not the rule for 3.
• EI added the digits but left out the 4 at the end, so my sum was four too small.

4.B — 15KA-0056Place value and digit positions

• AI checked that the digits differ and stopped, without working out how much the swap actually changes the number.
• CI saw a difference of 2 between the digits and expected that to give a change of 36.
• DI ignored the direction: swapping this number makes it smaller, not bigger.
• EI picked a number whose digits differ by 4 without noticing that the larger digit is already in front.

5.A — 3KA-0076Casework

• BI included 0 and 7 as a pair, even though both numbers have to be bigger than zero.
• CI counted both orders of each pair, even though swapping does not make a new way.
• DI counted every starting number from 1 to 7 without checking which pairs repeat.
• EI counted both orders and also allowed pairs of equal numbers.

6.B — Box X is not redKA-0099Reading a logical statement precisely

• AI read the rule backwards, as if being heavy were what makes a box red.
• CI assumed not red must mean one particular other colour, when the rule says nothing about which.
• DI contradicted the rule I was given rather than applying it to box X.
• EI decided one fact could not settle anything, without testing what would follow if X were red.

7.B — 8KA-0100Working backwards

• AI undid the operations in the order they were written instead of in reverse order.
• CI gave the final answer back, assuming the three steps cancelled each other out.
• DI doubled the 11 and subtracted the 6 but forgot the final halving that undoes the doubling.
• EI undid only the halving and stopped there without touching the other two steps.

8.C — 28KA-0123Eliminate impossible choices by bounding

• AI ruled out the square 6 by 6, forgetting that a square is a rectangle.
• BI did not think to try 4 by 9, so I judged this perimeter impossible.
• DI missed the 3 by 12 rectangle when listing the factor pairs.
• EI stopped listing factor pairs before reaching 2 by 18.

9.D — 120KA-0148Clock geometry: hands, angles, times

• AI gave the angle for a single hour mark rather than the four marks between the hands.
• BI counted two hour marks instead of four.
• CI assumed any gap of a few hours is a right angle, as it is at three o'clock.
• EI measured the angle the long way round the clock face instead of the smaller one.

10.A — 4KA-0154Inclusion–exclusion with two sets

• BI found how many students play at least one of the two and answered with that instead.
• CI added 18 and 15 to get 33, subtracted the 30 in the class, and used the 3 left over.
• DI removed the 7 from both groups and subtracted 11 and 8 from 30, taking the overlap away twice.
• EI answered with the number who play both, which is what the question gave me rather than what it asked for.