Worksheet generator

1.B — square 3KA-0005Nets and folding, 2D to 3D

• AI picked the square directly next to the shaded one in the net, but neighbours in the net share an edge on the cube.
• CI counted to the far end of the column, assuming the square furthest away in the net is the one opposite.
• DI picked one of the side flaps because it is not touching the shaded square in the drawing.
• EI picked the other side flap for the same reason, without tracking what happens as the net folds.

2.B — 2KA-0011Divisibility rules: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10

• AI added the known digits to get 13 and then checked whether the missing digit itself was a multiple of 3.
• CI chose 3 because the question mentioned dividing by 3, without testing the digit sum at all.
• DI tested the last two digits, which is the rule for 4, not the rule for 3.
• EI added the digits but left out the 4 at the end, so my sum was four too small.

3.B — 2KA-0016Dice and cube face relationships

• AI used the upper die's touching face instead of the lower one, so I worked from 3 rather than 5.
• CI gave the number on a touching face itself rather than the number opposite it.
• DI subtracted 3 from 7 because I confused which die was sitting on which.
• EI gave the lower die's upward face, which is the number I was told, not the hidden one underneath.

4.C — 61KA-0030Arithmetic sequences and the nth term

• AI added the step 18 times, counting the gaps between terms one too few.
• BI multiplied the step of 3 by 20 and forgot that the first term is already in place.
• DI used a first term of 3 instead of 4 while adding 20 steps.
• EI added the step 20 times to the first term instead of 19 times.

5.D — 16KA-0033Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI subtracted the two means from each other and gave the difference as the removed number.
• BI assumed the removed number must be the new mean, since the mean dropped to 11.
• CI assumed removing a number equal to the old mean is what changes the mean.
• EI added the two totals instead of subtracting one from the other.

6.C — 9 timesKA-0042Scaling and similar figures

• AI applied the length scale factor straight to the area.
• BI doubled the scale factor because area involves two dimensions, instead of squaring it.
• DI multiplied the scale factor by four, as though area scaled with the number of sides.
• EI cubed the scale factor, which is the rule for volume rather than area.

7.B — 2 hoursKA-0044Combined work rates

• AI subtracted the two times from each other rather than adding the rates.
• CI averaged the two times, which would only be right if the taps took turns instead of running together.
• DI added the two times together, which makes the tank slower with two taps than with one.
• EI used the faster tap's time alone and ignored the contribution of the slower one.

8.B — 15KA-0056Place value and digit positions

• AI checked that the digits differ and stopped, without working out how much the swap actually changes the number.
• CI saw a difference of 2 between the digits and expected that to give a change of 36.
• DI ignored the direction: swapping this number makes it smaller, not bigger.
• EI picked a number whose digits differ by 4 without noticing that the larger digit is already in front.

9.D — 144KA-0063Divisibility rules: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10

• AI checked that it divides by 4 and stopped without testing the 9.
• BI checked the digit sum for 9 and stopped without testing the 4.
• CI saw an even number with a digit sum of 6 and treated 6 as good enough for 9.
• EI tested 9 with the digit sum and assumed any odd multiple of 9 also divides by 4.

10.C — 11KA-0066Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI assumed the missing number must be the mean itself.
• BI averaged the three known numbers instead of working from the total.
• DI repeated one of the numbers already given rather than computing the missing one.
• EI used a total of 37 instead of 36, adding the mean in once too often.

11.B — 3KA-0068Tree diagrams

• AI read the two in exactly two heads as the answer rather than as a condition to count.
• CI counted the outcomes with two or more heads, so I included the three-head one as well.
• DI counted the orderings of three different objects instead of listing the eight outcomes.
• EI gave the total number of possible outcomes rather than the number with exactly two heads.

12.B — 40KA-0080Properties of triangles and quadrilaterals

• AI subtracted 100 from 180 and then divided by four instead of by two.
• CI assumed the two equal angles are always 45 degrees.
• DI gave what is left after taking 100 from 180 without splitting it between the two angles.
• EI made the 100 one of the equal pair, which would already exceed 180 degrees on its own.

13.C — 18KA-0084Area by dissection and rearrangement

• AI added the two different side lengths without doubling for the opposite pair.
• BI halved the square's perimeter of 24 and adjusted by three, treating the cut as if it removed length.
• DI gave the perimeter of the whole square instead of one of the pieces.
• EI gave the area of the square rather than the perimeter of a piece.

14.D — 6KA-0085Line and rotational symmetry

• AI checked only the vertical and horizontal folds and stopped there.
• BI counted the lines through opposite corners and forgot the ones through opposite edges.
• CI assumed a hexagon behaves like a rectangle with a couple of extra folds.
• EI counted each line twice, once from each end.

15.B — 10KA-0087Scaling and similar figures

• AI added the difference between the areas' square roots to the side rather than multiplying by their ratio.
• CI doubled the side because the larger area is roughly double the smaller.
• DI used the ratio of the areas as if it were the ratio of the lengths, then adjusted.
• EI multiplied the side by the ratio of the areas divided by three, mixing up which ratio applies to lengths.

16.B — 1KA-0089Building and counting with unit cubes

• AI assumed every small cube touches the outside somewhere.
• CI counted the cubes at the centre of each face, which are painted on one side.
• DI counted the corner cubes, which are the most painted rather than the least.
• EI gave the total number of small cubes instead of the unpainted ones.

17.B — 60KA-0093Weighing and balance puzzles

• AI halved the apple's weight, as if one apple balanced two pears.
• CI assumed a pear must weigh the same as an apple because the two sides balance.
• DI multiplied the apple's weight by three halves the wrong way round, making the pear heavier.
• EI gave the total weight of the two apples rather than the weight of one pear.

18.B — Bo onlyKA-0096Truth-tellers and liars

• AI took Ana's statement at face value without checking whether a truthful person could say it.
• CI decided nobody was lying without testing Ana's statement against that assumption.
• DI believed Ana's statement even after concluding she was a liar, which is what a liar's statement cannot be.
• EI gave up when Ana's statement looked circular, instead of testing one assumption all the way through.

19.B — 8KA-0100Working backwards

• AI undid the operations in the order they were written instead of in reverse order.
• CI gave the final answer back, assuming the three steps cancelled each other out.
• DI doubled the 11 and subtracted the 6 but forgot the final halving that undoes the doubling.
• EI undid only the halving and stopped there without touching the other two steps.

20.A — Yes, alwaysKA-0102Informal proof by contradiction

• BI found one pair that works and assumed the argument depended on that particular card.
• CI tried a couple of selections, did not find a pair, and stopped looking.
• DI looked for a pattern in the numbers rather than at how many pairs there are to avoid.
• EI thought the answer depended on which six were taken, when the counting settles it for every choice.

21.B — 21KA-0104Recursive rules

• AI counted the two starting terms as one, so I stopped at the seventh term.
• CI added the two before it but slipped once in the middle of the chain.
• DI generated one term too many and gave the ninth.
• EI doubled each term instead of adding the two before it.

22.B — 4KA-0111Age problems

• AI aged only the child and left the mother's age unchanged.
• CI looked for when the mother is four times as old rather than three times.
• DI used the age difference of 24 and halved it, without checking the ratio it gives.
• EI gave the difference between their ages, which never changes, instead of a number of years.

23.B — 21.5KA-0115Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI halved the 60 pencils before giving any away.
• CI subtracted 17 from one box of 12 rather than from the whole 60.
• DI gave the number of pencils left over rather than what each child gets.
• EI gave the starting number of pencils without doing either of the steps.

24.C — 150KA-0117Rate, time, distance

• AI divided 150 by 60 and read the answer as minutes rather than hours.
• BI used 1.5 hours instead of 2.5, dividing 90 by 60 rather than 150.
• DI converted 2.5 hours as two hours and fifty minutes.
• EI multiplied the distance by 60 instead of dividing, then converted.

25.A — 12KA-0122Back-solve from the answer choices

• BI assumed a number with two different prime factors always has six factors.
• CI counted the factors of 16 as six by including a number twice.
• DI assumed a square number has six factors without listing them.
• EI counted the powers of 3 up to 27 and thought there were six of them.

26.C — 28KA-0123Eliminate impossible choices by bounding

• AI ruled out the square 6 by 6, forgetting that a square is a rectangle.
• BI did not think to try 4 by 9, so I judged this perimeter impossible.
• DI missed the 3 by 12 rectangle when listing the factor pairs.
• EI stopped listing factor pairs before reaching 2 by 18.

27.D — 1200KA-0128Check units and re-read before bubbling

• AI worked entirely in metres and gave the answer in square metres.
• BI multiplied 30 by 0.4 without converting the metres to centimetres at all.
• CI converted 0.4 m to 4 cm rather than 40 cm.
• EI converted 0.4 m to 400 cm, moving the decimal point one place too far.

28.B — 30 cmKA-0155Scaling and similar figures

• AI kept the difference of 4 cm between the two sides instead of keeping their ratio.
• CI added 20 to 12 rather than scaling 12.
• DI used the scale factor upside down and multiplied 12 by 8/20 instead of 20/8.
• EI multiplied 12 by 1.5, the ratio between the original sides, instead of by the enlargement factor.

29.A — 56KA-0163Selections of a few objects

• BI counted ordered selections, so I counted the same three people once for every order they could stand in.
• CI multiplied the 8 members by the 3 places, which counts something quite different from a selection.
• DI divided the 336 ordered selections by 3 instead of by 3 factorial.
• EI chose 2 people rather than 3.

30.A — 6KA-0173Counting up to symmetry

• BI counted every colouring of the four edges and forgot that rotations make some of them identical.
• CI divided 16 by 4, but that only works when no painting is left unchanged by a rotation, and some are.
• DI halved 16, treating only the 180 degree turn as a symmetry.
• EI listed by how many edges are black but forgot that two black edges can be adjacent or opposite.