Worksheet generator

1.D — 16KA-0033Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI subtracted the two means from each other and gave the difference as the removed number.
• BI assumed the removed number must be the new mean, since the mean dropped to 11.
• CI assumed removing a number equal to the old mean is what changes the mean.
• EI added the two totals instead of subtracting one from the other.

2.D — 144KA-0063Divisibility rules: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10

• AI checked that it divides by 4 and stopped without testing the 9.
• BI checked the digit sum for 9 and stopped without testing the 4.
• CI saw an even number with a digit sum of 6 and treated 6 as good enough for 9.
• EI tested 9 with the digit sum and assumed any odd multiple of 9 also divides by 4.

3.C — 11KA-0066Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI assumed the missing number must be the mean itself.
• BI averaged the three known numbers instead of working from the total.
• DI repeated one of the numbers already given rather than computing the missing one.
• EI used a total of 37 instead of 36, adding the mean in once too often.

4.B — 3KA-0068Tree diagrams

• AI read the two in exactly two heads as the answer rather than as a condition to count.
• CI counted the outcomes with two or more heads, so I included the three-head one as well.
• DI counted the orderings of three different objects instead of listing the eight outcomes.
• EI gave the total number of possible outcomes rather than the number with exactly two heads.

5.C — 18KA-0084Area by dissection and rearrangement

• AI added the two different side lengths without doubling for the opposite pair.
• BI halved the square's perimeter of 24 and adjusted by three, treating the cut as if it removed length.
• DI gave the perimeter of the whole square instead of one of the pieces.
• EI gave the area of the square rather than the perimeter of a piece.

6.B — 10KA-0087Scaling and similar figures

• AI added the difference between the areas' square roots to the side rather than multiplying by their ratio.
• CI doubled the side because the larger area is roughly double the smaller.
• DI used the ratio of the areas as if it were the ratio of the lengths, then adjusted.
• EI multiplied the side by the ratio of the areas divided by three, mixing up which ratio applies to lengths.

7.B — 1KA-0089Building and counting with unit cubes

• AI assumed every small cube touches the outside somewhere.
• CI counted the cubes at the centre of each face, which are painted on one side.
• DI counted the corner cubes, which are the most painted rather than the least.
• EI gave the total number of small cubes instead of the unpainted ones.

8.B — 60KA-0093Weighing and balance puzzles

• AI halved the apple's weight, as if one apple balanced two pears.
• CI assumed a pear must weigh the same as an apple because the two sides balance.
• DI multiplied the apple's weight by three halves the wrong way round, making the pear heavier.
• EI gave the total weight of the two apples rather than the weight of one pear.

9.B — 8KA-0100Working backwards

• AI undid the operations in the order they were written instead of in reverse order.
• CI gave the final answer back, assuming the three steps cancelled each other out.
• DI doubled the 11 and subtracted the 6 but forgot the final halving that undoes the doubling.
• EI undid only the halving and stopped there without touching the other two steps.

10.B — 21KA-0104Recursive rules

• AI counted the two starting terms as one, so I stopped at the seventh term.
• CI added the two before it but slipped once in the middle of the chain.
• DI generated one term too many and gave the ninth.
• EI doubled each term instead of adding the two before it.

11.B — 21.5KA-0115Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI halved the 60 pencils before giving any away.
• CI subtracted 17 from one box of 12 rather than from the whole 60.
• DI gave the number of pencils left over rather than what each child gets.
• EI gave the starting number of pencils without doing either of the steps.

12.D — 1200KA-0128Check units and re-read before bubbling

• AI worked entirely in metres and gave the answer in square metres.
• BI multiplied 30 by 0.4 without converting the metres to centimetres at all.
• CI converted 0.4 m to 4 cm rather than 40 cm.
• EI converted 0.4 m to 400 cm, moving the decimal point one place too far.

13.B — 30 cmKA-0155Scaling and similar figures

• AI kept the difference of 4 cm between the two sides instead of keeping their ratio.
• CI added 20 to 12 rather than scaling 12.
• DI used the scale factor upside down and multiplied 12 by 8/20 instead of 20/8.
• EI multiplied 12 by 1.5, the ratio between the original sides, instead of by the enlargement factor.

14.A — 56KA-0163Selections of a few objects

• BI counted ordered selections, so I counted the same three people once for every order they could stand in.
• CI multiplied the 8 members by the 3 places, which counts something quite different from a selection.
• DI divided the 336 ordered selections by 3 instead of by 3 factorial.
• EI chose 2 people rather than 3.

15.A — 6KA-0173Counting up to symmetry

• BI counted every colouring of the four edges and forgot that rotations make some of them identical.
• CI divided 16 by 4, but that only works when no painting is left unchanged by a rotation, and some are.
• DI halved 16, treating only the 180 degree turn as a symmetry.
• EI listed by how many edges are black but forgot that two black edges can be adjacent or opposite.