Worksheet generator

1.C — 55 degreesKA-0022Angles on lines, in triangles, in polygons

• AI assumed the triangle was isosceles because it had a right angle, so I repeated the 35.
• BI assumed a right-angled triangle always has two 45 degree angles.
• DI subtracted 35 from 100 instead of from 90, mixing the angle sum up with a round number.
• EI subtracted only the 35 from 180 and forgot to take off the right angle as well.

2.E — 60KA-0026Percentages and simple discounts

• AI worked out the size of the discount and gave that as the new price instead of subtracting it.
• BI treated a quarter off as half off and took the price down to 40.
• CI applied the 25% reduction twice, taking 80 down to 60 and then 60 down to 45.
• DI subtracted 25 euros rather than 25 percent, treating the percentage as an amount of money.

3.E — 24KA-0038Building and counting with unit cubes

• AI added the three measurements together instead of multiplying them.
• BI counted one layer of 4 by 3 and forgot that the block is two layers tall.
• CI read the block as 3 by 3 by 2 because the drawing hid the far column.
• DI counted only the cubes whose faces I could actually see in the picture.

4.C — 9:36KA-0041Factors, multiples, LCM and GCD by listing

• AI found the greatest common divisor of 12 and 18 instead of the least common multiple.
• BI added the two intervals together rather than looking for a time that is a multiple of both.
• DI found a common multiple but not the least one, landing on a later coincidence.
• EI multiplied the two intervals together instead of finding their least common multiple.

5.E — 86400KA-0124Estimate to the nearest choice

• AI gave the number of minutes in a day instead of the number of seconds.
• BI gave the number of seconds in one hour rather than in a whole day.
• CI multiplied the 24 hours by a round thousand instead of converting properly.
• DI multiplied 60 by a round thousand, using one conversion and inventing the other.

6.A — 8KA-0144Translating a sentence into an equation

• BI subtracted 8 from 19 rather than working the two steps backwards.
• CI subtracted the 3 from 19 and gave that without halving it.
• DI added the 3 to 19 instead of subtracting it.
• EI doubled 19 and added 3, applying the machine forwards instead of undoing it.

7.E — Not all birds can flyKA-0146Reading a logical statement precisely

• AI read some cannot as meaning none can, which is a far stronger claim.
• BI chose a statement that directly contradicts the one I was given.
• CI read some as meaning a majority, when it only guarantees at least one.
• DI read some as meaning exactly one, when it means at least one.

8.C — 84KA-0027Area by subtraction (shaded regions)

• AI gave the area of the square that was cut out instead of the area that remains.
• BI subtracted the side length of the small square from the area of the big one.
• DI subtracted 4 rather than the small square's area of 16.
• EI gave the area of the whole square and forgot that a piece had been removed.

9.C — 9 timesKA-0042Scaling and similar figures

• AI applied the length scale factor straight to the area.
• BI doubled the scale factor because area involves two dimensions, instead of squaring it.
• DI multiplied the scale factor by four, as though area scaled with the number of sides.
• EI cubed the scale factor, which is the rule for volume rather than area.

10.A — 1KA-0053Remainders and modular cycles

• BI found the cycle 2, 4, 1 but read the remainder of 30 divided by 3 as one instead of zero.
• CI counted the cycle positions from zero, which shifted my answer one step along.
• DI divided 30 by 7 and used that remainder rather than the remainder of the powers.
• EI assumed the remainder would be one less than the divisor because the power is large.

11.B — 4% lowerKA-0065Percentages and simple discounts

• AI applied only the decrease and forgot that the price had already risen.
• CI assumed a rise and a fall of the same percentage cancel each other out exactly.
• DI got the size of the change right but the direction wrong.
• EI added the two percentages together instead of applying them one after the other.

12.C — 11KA-0066Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI assumed the missing number must be the mean itself.
• BI averaged the three known numbers instead of working from the total.
• DI repeated one of the numbers already given rather than computing the missing one.
• EI used a total of 37 instead of 36, adding the mean in once too often.

13.D — 24KA-0073Arrangements of a few objects

• AI counted the letters rather than their arrangements.
• BI multiplied 4 by 3 and stopped, forgetting the last two positions.
• CI used 4 choices for every position, as if letters could repeat.
• EI used 4 choices in each of four positions, which allows every letter to repeat.

14.B — BoKA-0092Ordering and ranking from clues

• AI gave the child who is first rather than the one who is second.
• CI placed Cal directly after Ana, reading ahead of Dee as meaning immediately ahead.
• DI built the order backwards from the last position instead of forwards from the first.
• EI assumed the clues left several orders open without checking that they chain into a single one.

15.C — 55KA-0107Growth patterns and figurate numbers

• AI stopped at the eighth triangle, losing count while adding the rows.
• BI gave the ninth triangle instead of the tenth, being one row short.
• DI gave the eleventh triangle, adding one row too many.
• EI squared the position number, which describes square patterns rather than triangular ones.

16.B — 12KA-0121Try small cases first

• AI used the number of hands each person shakes rather than the number of people.
• CI doubled the answer, forgetting that the halving has already been done.
• DI halved 66 and treated that as the number of people.
• EI gave the number of handshakes back as the number of people.

17.A — 12KA-0122Back-solve from the answer choices

• BI assumed a number with two different prime factors always has six factors.
• CI counted the factors of 16 as six by including a number twice.
• DI assumed a square number has six factors without listing them.
• EI counted the powers of 3 up to 27 and thought there were six of them.

18.C — 28KA-0123Eliminate impossible choices by bounding

• AI ruled out the square 6 by 6, forgetting that a square is a rectangle.
• BI did not think to try 4 by 9, so I judged this perimeter impossible.
• DI missed the 3 by 12 rectangle when listing the factor pairs.
• EI stopped listing factor pairs before reaching 2 by 18.

19.D — 1200KA-0128Check units and re-read before bubbling

• AI worked entirely in metres and gave the answer in square metres.
• BI multiplied 30 by 0.4 without converting the metres to centimetres at all.
• CI converted 0.4 m to 4 cm rather than 40 cm.
• EI converted 0.4 m to 400 cm, moving the decimal point one place too far.

20.C — 8KA-0147Circles: radius, diameter, and touching circles

• AI subtracted the radii, which is the answer when one circle sits inside the other.
• BI averaged the two radii instead of adding them.
• DI multiplied the radii together rather than adding them.
• EI added the two diameters instead of the two radii.

21.A — 8KA-0031Counting paths on a grid

• BI assumed closing one junction removes about half the routes and halved the total of 20.
• CI counted the routes that pass through the closed junction and gave that instead of the ones that avoid it.
• DI subtracted only the 2 routes that reach the closed junction, not all the routes that continue through it.
• EI counted every route on the open grid and forgot to remove the ones through the closed junction.

22.E — No, because the colours do not balanceKA-0034Coloring arguments

• AI assumed that because 14 is even, seven dominoes must fit somehow.
• BI tried a few arrangements, got most of the board covered, and assumed a full covering existed.
• CI claimed the right answer for the wrong reason, since 14 is in fact divisible by 2.
• DI thought removing a different pair of opposite corners could change the colour balance, but opposite corners always share a colour.

23.E — 9KA-0037Last-digit behavior of products and powers

• AI assumed a number this large has no reachable last digit and gave up on the cycle.
• BI found the cycle 7, 9, 3, 1 but used a remainder of 0 when the remainder is actually 2.
• CI found the cycle but counted its positions starting at zero, shifting my answer along by one.
• DI assumed the units digit of any power of 7 is always 7.

24.C — 4KA-0040The pigeonhole principle

• AI answered with the lucky case, where the first two socks happen to match.
• BI used the number of colours as my answer without adding one for the sock that must repeat.
• DI worked from the number of socks of each colour instead of the number of colours.
• EI took the whole drawer, guaranteeing a pair but far more socks than are needed.

25.D — 12KA-0060Operation puzzles and cryptarithms

• AI added the digits of 132 instead of working out what A and B must be.
• BI found A + B correctly and then halved it, as if the question wanted one digit.
• CI spotted the 11 in the working and gave that instead of the sum it multiplies.
• EI found a pair of digits by trial and misadded them by one.

26.B — 9KA-0095The extremal principle

• AI divided 100 by 12 and rounded down instead of up.
• CI rounded the division to a convenient number without checking that a packing with a smaller maximum exists.
• DI gave the number of boxes as the answer rather than a number of apples.
• EI described the case where one box holds everything, which is possible but not guaranteed.

27.D — No, because the number of moves is oddKA-0097Parity arguments

• AI assumed enough moves can undo anything, without asking what each move preserves.
• BI tried a few sequences that nearly worked and assumed a better choice would finish the job.
• CI reached for the number of items rather than for what a single swap actually changes.
• EI thought the choice of swaps could change the outcome, when every swap has the same effect.

28.C — No, the last number is always evenKA-0098Invariants and monovariants

• AI found sequences ending in small numbers and assumed 1 was among the reachable ones.
• BI assumed a hard-looking question must have exactly one answer.
• DI found one sequence ending in 0 and assumed every sequence must end there.
• EI thought the order could change the outcome, when the quantity that decides it never changes.

29.D — No, because the two colours cannot balanceKA-0101Coloring arguments

• AI checked that 100 divides by 4 and treated that as proof that a covering exists.
• BI assumed a covering must exist somewhere and that I simply had not found it yet.
• CI gave a reason that is not even true, since 100 really is a multiple of 4.
• EI thought orientation could rescue it, but every turn of a T covers the same mixture of colours.

30.B — Read all ten quickly, pick the two or three that look most doable, and fill in every answer before the endKA-0130Managing the 5-point block

• AI worked in order, so a hard early question could eat the time meant for easier later ones.
• CI assumed the hardest question is worth the most, but every question in this block scores the same.
• DI used length as a proxy for difficulty, which is not reliable in this block.
• EI spread the time equally, which is too little for the questions I could do and wasted on the ones I could not.